법무법인바른 사이트는 IE11이상 혹은 타 브라우저에서
정상적으로 구동되도록 구현되었습니다.

익스플로러 10 이하버전에서는 브라우저 버전 업데이트 혹은
엣지, 크롬, 사파리등의 다른 브라우저로 접속을 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.

Kang, Tae Hun 구성원변호사

구성원 소개

Attorney Kang, Tae Hun was appointed as a prosecutor at the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutors’ Office in 2007m and served as a prosecutor for approximately 11 years until his retirement from the Ministry of Justice in August 2017. During his career as a prosecutor, he worked in various departments, including special investigations, public security, violent crimes, and trials. In particular, he developed special expertise in industrial accident cases while serving as a public security prosecutor at the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office and the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office Ansan Branch.

Attorney Kang also gained extensive experience in administrative and national litigation while working at the National Litigation Division of the Ministry of Justice, where he supervised and actively participated in government administrative litigation.

Since joining Barun Law LLC as a partner attorney in September 2017, Attorney Kang has primarily focused on: △ Anti-corruption financial and economic crimes, △ Election crimes, △ White collar criminal defense, △ Fair trade investigations and defense.

He is also a key member of the firm's Major Accident Response Center, specializing in industrial accident cases and compliance with the Serious Accidents Punishment Act. Attorney Kang's in-depth knowledge and extensive experience in these areas underscore his significant capabilities in handling complex criminal and administrative litigation.

학력

  • 2016Visiting Scholar, Centre for East Asian Studies Groningen
  • 2007Judicial Research and Training Institute of Supreme Court of Korea (36th)
  • 2004Passed the Korean Bar Exam (46th)
  • 2002Hanyang University
  • 1994Jeju Ohyun High School

경력

  • 2017 ~ PresentPartner, Barun Law LLC
  • 2022 ~ PresentMember, Presidential Secretariat Administrative Trial Commission
  • 2021 ~ 2023Legal Advisor, Seoul City
  • 2016 ~ 2017Litigation Division, Ministry of Justice
  • 2013 ~ 2016Ansan Branch of Suwon District Public Prosecutors’ Office (Awarded the Prosecutor General’s Commendation, 2014)
  • 2011 ~ 2013Daejeon District Public Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2009 ~ 2011Wonju Branch of Chuncheon District Public Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2007 ~ 2009Seoul Eastern District Public Prosecutors’ Office

주요 업무 및 활동

Criminal

- Investigated the case concerning acceptance of bribe by deputy chairman of an assembly of a regional municipality

- Investigated the case concerning breach of the Attorney-At-Law Act by an owner of a regional newspaper company

- Investigated several cases concerning breach of the Public Official Election Act in connection with regional government elections

- Investigated several labor- and industrial safety-related cases, including obstruction of business in connection with a strike that occurred at a public enterprise


Investigation Response

- Directed several cases concerning crimes related to public officials, elections and labor


Administrative

- Directed several litigation cases under which the state was a party, including cases seeking disciplinary action against public officials and claims for disclosure of various types of information

프로필

02-3479-2462

taehun.kang@barunlaw.com

최근업무사례

[공정거래] 중견건설사의 하도급대금 미지급 등에 대한 공정위 조사에서 무혐의 및 심사절차종료 결정 등을 도출

[공정거래] 추가공사비 등 미지급을 이유로 하는 하도급법 위반 혐의 건에서 공정위의 심사절차종료 결정 등을 도출

[지식재산] 비변리행위의 변호사법 위반 여부가 문제된 고발대리 사건

[민사] 홍콩 소재 회사가 국내 물류회사를 상대로 제기한 손해배상청구 소송에서 1심 전부 승소

[건설행정] 창원SM타운 실시협약해지 효력정지 가처분 신청 인용 사례

[형사] 계열사 주식처분으로 인한 배임 혐의로 고소당한 의뢰인을 대리해 검찰 불기소처분을 받은 사례

[민사] 정수슬러지 재활용사업과 관련하여, 서울시를 상대로 제기된 130억 원 상당 손해배상청구 소송에서 전부 승소한 사례

[민사] 토양환경보전법상 정화책임 및 불법행위로 34억 원 상당의 오염토양 정화비용이 구상 청구된 사안의 항소심에서 전부 승소한 사례

[기업형사] 신탁사 직원의 횡령사건에 연루되어 구속기소된 부동산 시행사 임직원 모두에게 무죄가 선고된 사건

[기업형사] 비상장회사가 상장회사를 인수하는 과정에서 회사의 임직원들이 자본시장법위반(사기적부정거래), 특경가법위반(사기, 배임) 등으로 입건된 사안에 대하여 혐의없음(증거불충분)으로 전부 종결시킨 사례

[조세형사] 인력공급업체 대표 2명에 대하여 특가법위반(조세), 특경법위반(횡령) 등의 혐의로 구속영장이 청구되었으나 이를 모두 기각시킨 사례

[기업형사] 업무상과실치상죄로 고소된 S건설회사 현장소장을 대리하여 경찰의 불송치 결정을 이끌어낸 사례