법무법인바른 사이트는 IE11이상 혹은 타 브라우저에서
정상적으로 구동되도록 구현되었습니다.

익스플로러 10 이하버전에서는 브라우저 버전 업데이트 혹은
엣지, 크롬, 사파리등의 다른 브라우저로 접속을 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.

Cho, Jae Bin 구성원변호사

학력

  • 2016Certified Class 2 “Blue Belt” Prosecutor in the area of construction and civil engineering (certified by the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office of the Republic of Korea)
  • 2011Duke University School of Law (LL.M.)
  • 2000Judicial Research and Training Institute of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea (29th)
  • 1997Passed the Bar Exam (39th)
  • 1997Graduate School of Law, Seoul National University
  • 1993College of Law, Seoul National University
  • 1989Jinju Dongmyung High School

경력

  • 2022 ~ PresentPartner, Barun Law LLC
  • 2022 – PresentMember, Ombudsman Regulation and Deliberations Committee of Korea Housing-Finance Corporation
  • 2022 ~ PresentMember, Self-Regulation and Deliberations Committee of the Office for Government Policy Coordination
  • 2021 ~ 2022Deputy Chief Prosecutor, Incheon District Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2020 ~ 2021Deputy Chief Prosecutor, Busan District Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2019 ~ 2020Investigation Planning Officer, Capital Market Investigation Unit, Financial Services Commission
  • 2018 ~ 2019Professor, Institute of Justice Yongin Branch
  • 2017 ~ 2018Research Officer, Supreme Prosecutors’ Office of the Republic of Korea
  • 2016 ~ 2017Senior Prosecutor, Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office (Special Unit 4)
  • 2015 ~ 2016Senior Prosecutor, Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office (Criminal Unit 6)
  • 2014 ~ 2015Legal Advisor (head of the government’s integrated anti-corruption group), Office for Government Policy Coordination
  • 2013 ~ 2014Deputy Senior Prosecutor, Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office (Special Unit 4)
  • 2010 ~ 2013Prosecutor, Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2008 ~ 2010Planning Prosecutor, Ministry of Justice
  • 2006 ~ 2008Prosecutor, Cheongju District Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2003 ~ 2006Prosecutor, Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2002 ~ 2003Prosecutor, Yeoju Branch of Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office
  • 2000 ~ 2002Prosecutor, Busan District Prosecutors’ Office

주요 업무 및 활동

White Collar Crime

- A case involving an investigation into legal irregularities concerning management right (valued at KRW 375.5 billion) succession by the members of group L’s founding family, and through this case the honorary chairman was sentenced to three years of imprisonment and the chairman was sentenced to 2.5 years of imprisonment and four years of stay of execution (24 people charged)

- A case involving company M, whose vice chairman was found to have embezzled KRW 4.8 billion during an eight-year period via partner companies, and dairy company S's CEO and employees of company M have been found to have received KRW 250 million from suppliers, and through this case 13 people were charged and three people arrested

- A case involving an executive director of company H, who solicited a director and essential researchers of manufacturer C and thereby leaked trade secrets worth KRW 340 billion, and through this case six people were charged and six people arrested

- A case involving an investigation into lobbying efforts made towards a Presidential Office aide and the Chairman of the Korea Fair Trade Commission requesting for reduction of the unreasonable amount of fees imposed by a large online shopping mall company and through this case several people were porsecuted

- A case where four steel companies, including company D, company E and company H colluded with one another on the purchase price changes of metal scraps 39 times during a seven-year period and through this case several people were prosecuted

- A case involving a legal broker receiving KRW 2.8 of funds from large construction companies, including company H, company P, company L and company S and through this case several people were prosecuted

Reconstruction and Redevelopment

- A case involving construction company S, which lobbied a housing association head by providing KRW 1 billion so that the company can be appointed as the construction company, and through the investigation process several district councilmen were prosecuted, as directors of the association who were also district councilmen of the relevant district office were found to have been involved in the vote rigging of the district council chairman election

- A case involving ** New Town redevelopment project where officers of construction companies, who lobbied and offered KRW 800 million to be appointed as the construction company and during which the head of the relevant district office received KRW 300 million therefrom, and through this case several people were prosecuted

- A case involving the representative and deputy director of construction company S receiving KRW 500 million from the developer of hotel B and the representative of the developer embezzling KRW 21.1 billion of corporate funds, and through this case several people were prosecuted

- A case involving the head of a housing association and a demolition company offering approximately KRW 200 million to the minority party representative and aide as bribe, as part of a lobbying effort for certain legislation, with respect to an investigation launched against ** local housing program, and through the case it was discovered that the aide received KRW 200 million of political funds to support the head of the relevant district office in the election and as election costs and thereby several people were prosecuted

- A case involving an investigation into the corruption concerning the ** redevelopment project and through the case it was discovered that the head of the relevant district office and three members of the housing association had breached the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (bribery), by receiving bribes in the amount of KRW 300 million (in the case of the head of the district office) and KRW 100 million, each (in the case of the members of the housing association), and thereby several people were prosecuted

Financial Criminal Matters

- A case where wrongful transactions involving the chairman and officers of savings bank S (12 people) were discovered and a request was made for investigations

- A case where 11 people were discovered to have been involved in the market price manipulation of company E, four people involved in the market price manipulation of company M, and seven people involved in wrongful transactions of company K, with respect to asset management company L, and where a request was made for investigations

- A case where five people, including the representative of company K, and three former and current employees and officers of bio company S were uncovered to have made use of undisclosed information concerning company K’s treatment drug, and where a request was made for investigations

Publication(s)

- U.S. Warrant System and Investigative Activities (Research Journal of Prosecutors Training overseas), Legal Training Institute (2012)

- Annotated Criminal Code 10: Articles (7), Pakyoungsa (Joint Authorship) (2023)

프로필

02-3479-2490

jaebin.cho@barunlaw.com

최근업무사례

[금융형사] 테라 · 루나 폭락 관련 차이페이 결제 시스템을 개발, 관리한 프로그래머를 대리해 사실 관계와 법리 관련 쟁점을 검토하고 법원을 잘 설득하여 구속영장을 기각시킨 사례

[금융형사] 에디슨모터스의 쌍용자동차 인수, 바이오자산 양수 등 대규모 주가조작 사건과 관련되어 출국금지된 상태에서 회사와 주거지를 모두 압수수색 당한 주요 혐의자인 의뢰인을 15회 조사 후 불입건되도록 한 사례

[형사] 교제 당시 동의 없이 신체를 촬영했다고 주장하며 피의자를 고소한 사안에서 경찰이 기소의견으로 송치하였으나, 추가 증거 발굴 및 적극 변호로 불송치(혐의없음) 등으로 사건 종결한 사례

[금융형사] 새마을금고중앙회 회장이 2억 5,000만 원 상당을 수수했다는 혐의에 대하여 검찰의 구속영장청구를 2회 기각하여 불구속 상태에서 재판을 받을 수 있도록 한 사안

[형사] 특수절도(징역형만 있음) 등으로 기소되어 유죄선고시 자격정지될 회계사를 선임하여 검찰이 절도교사(벌금형 있음)로 공소장변경 후 벌금구형토록 하고, 최종적으로 벌금형을 선고받아 회계사 자격 유지에 지장이 없도록 한 사례

[금융자문] 공시번복 및 공시불이행에 따른 벌점 15점 부과시 상장폐지 위기에 처한 코스닥상장기업 대리해 상장유지시킨 사례

[노동형사] 기업 계열사 임원이 근로자 583명의 노조 탈퇴를 종용하는 등 노조법 위반 혐의로 구속영장이 청구되었으나 모두 기각시킨 사례

[형사] 대학교수가 청탁금지법위반죄로 기소의견으로 송치된 사안에서 보완수사를 통해 경찰의 불송치 결정을 받아낸 사례

[형사] 150억 원 상당 특경법위반(배임)죄 기소의견으로 송치된 상장회사 대표이사 등을 검찰 보완수사를 통해 모두 혐의없음 처분받도록 한 사례

[기업형사] 조세범처벌법위반죄로 고소당한 제약회사 대표이사를 변호하여 혐의없음 불송치결정을 받은 사례

[형사] 삼성전자가 전 해외법인 주재원을 상대로 특경법위반(배임)죄로 고소하여 검찰이 구속영장을 청구했으나 기각되도록 한 사례