법무법인바른 사이트는 IE11이상 혹은 타 브라우저에서
정상적으로 구동되도록 구현되었습니다.

익스플로러 10 이하버전에서는 브라우저 버전 업데이트 혹은
엣지, 크롬, 사파리등의 다른 브라우저로 접속을 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.

KOR ENG CHN

Trade Secret Protection

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Kwon, Oh Jun

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Kim, Kyeong Yeon

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Kim, Byung Joo

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Kim, Yong Ha

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Kim, Jin Suk

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Kim, Tae Hyung

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Park, Soon Kwan

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Baek, Chang Won

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Shim, Min Seon

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Lee, Sung Hun

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Jung, Young Hun

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Cho, Yoon Ji

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Choi, Jin Hyuk

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Han, Suh Hee

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Kim, Tae Sang

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Nam, Yeon Jeong

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Park, Joo Hyun

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Oh, Se Jun

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Lee, Da Sol

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Lee , Hye Jun

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Jin, Zhong Fu

  • 강병섭 변호사

    Im, Hong Gi

Introduction of Areas

Our Trade Secret Protection Team offers proactive services for the protection and prevention of trade secret infringement, as well as consistent, end-to-end support for dispute resolution in the post-infringement stage.

Key Contact

Major Practice Areas

- Consulting: Providing various consulting services for the protection of trade secrets.
- Litigation: Handling trade secret infringement lawsuits.
- Injunctions: Managing provisional injunctions against trade secret infringement.
- Non-Compete Injunctions: Handling provisional injunctions against former employees.
- Criminal Cases: Representing clients in related criminal proceedings.
- Consulting: Offering legal advice on trade secret infringement, including forensic analysis.

Representative Cases

- Infringement on Trade Secrets: A lawsuit to determine whether Korea N Power, a power generation subsidiary, infringed on the trade secrets of Company J, a design service provider.
- Injunction for Trade Secret Infringement: A case where Company A, the largest domestic manufacturer of waterproof adhesive for mobile phones, sought an injunction against Competitor B, claiming that B's mass-produced products infringed upon A's trade secrets.
- Trade Secret Infringement Claim: A lawsuit filed by Company M, which develops magnetic materials for electromagnetic shielding and absorption, seeking to prevent the infringement of its trade secrets.
- Non-Indictment Decision for Trade Secret Disclosure: A case where a person under investigation for trade secret disclosure received a non-indictment decision, meaning no charges were filed on the basis of insufficient evidence.

Recent Cases

[Trade Secret Protection] Barun Law Successfully Established that the "Protection Period" of a Trade Secret Had Not Expired by Proving that Its Value Remained Intact Despite Prolonged Litigation
[Intellectual Property] Barun Law helps a victim obtain a Supreme Court Decision to quash and remand the case by demonstrating the existence of an unfair purpose against defendants who were alleged of unauthorized acquisition, use or disclosure of trade secrets
[Intellectual Property] Barun Law uncovers the infringement of trade secrets secretly committed and obtains an injunctive relief and damages for the client
[Trade Secrets] Barun Law obtains a decision that the client is clear of suspicion and is not sent to the prosecution with regard to the allegation of disclosure of trade secrets.
[Trade Secrets] We successfully protected the right of the largest local developer of waterproof adhesives for mobile phones to trade secrets in relation to an injunction filed against its competitor and alleged infringer of trade secrets
[Trade Secrets] An accusation made against “former employees” who have established a new company by disclosing “computer program trade secrets,” for infringement of trade secrets, and all four former employees were found guilty and sentenced to two years of imprisonment (immediately taken under court custody)
[Intellectual Property] A case in which an application for interim injunctive relief was denied on the basis of a patent that was null and void due to the violation of novelty
[Intellectual Property] A case in which we drew a decision from the patent court that a certain registered trademark, which had been found invalid because it constituted a “technical mark” at the district court, was valid
[Intellectual Property] A case in which the client’s application for interim injunctive relief to prohibit the infringement of intellectual property rights to the cover for wireless earphone cases to which similar products exist
[Trade Secrets] Barun obtained a decision in which a defendant of an appeal case found innocent, precluding the admissibility of evidence collected by illegal seizure and search.
[Intellectual Property] Implied permission to use business secrets

Professionals