법무법인바른 사이트는 IE11이상 혹은 타 브라우저에서
정상적으로 구동되도록 구현되었습니다.
익스플로러 10 이하버전에서는 브라우저 버전 업데이트 혹은
엣지, 크롬, 사파리등의 다른 브라우저로 접속을 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.
익스플로러 10 이하버전에서는 브라우저 버전 업데이트 혹은
엣지, 크롬, 사파리등의 다른 브라우저로 접속을 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.
영업비밀보호팀은 국내외적으로 보호필요성이 계속 증가하고 그에 따라 분쟁이 증가하고 있는 기업의 영업비밀에 관하여 보호 및 침해방지를 위한 사전적 서비스를 제공함은 물론 사후단계의 분쟁해결까지 일관 서비스를 제공하고 있습니다.
- 발전자회사인 한국N발전이 설계용역사인 J사의 영업비밀을 침해하였는지 여부가 문제된 사건
- 국내 최대의 휴대폰용 방수 점착제 개발ㆍ제조업체인 A사가 경쟁업체 B사를 상대로 B사의 양산품이 영업비밀침해품임을 이유로 제기한 영업비밀침해금지가처분 사건
- 전자파를 차폐 및 흡수하는 자성 재료를 개발하는 M사가 영업비밀침해금지청구 사건
- 영업비밀누설 등의 혐의에 관하여 불송치결정(혐의없음)을 받은 사례
[Intellectual Property] Implied permission to use business secrets
[Trade Secrets] Barun obtained a decision in which a defendant of an appeal case found innocent, precluding the admissibility of evidence collected by illegal seizure and search.
[Intellectual Property] A case in which the client’s application for interim injunctive relief to prohibit the infringement of intellectual property rights to the cover for wireless earphone cases to which similar products exist
[Intellectual Property] A case in which we drew a decision from the patent court that a certain registered trademark, which had been found invalid because it constituted a “technical mark” at the district court, was valid
[Intellectual Property] A case in which an application for interim injunctive relief was denied on the basis of a patent that was null and void due to the violation of novelty
[Trade Secrets] We successfully protected the right of the largest local developer of waterproof adhesives for mobile phones to trade secrets in relation to an injunction filed against its competitor and alleged infringer of trade secrets
[Trade Secrets] Barun Law obtains a decision that the client is clear of suspicion and is not sent to the prosecution with regard to the allegation of disclosure of trade secrets.
[Intellectual Property] Barun Law uncovers the infringement of trade secrets secretly committed and obtains an injunctive relief and damages for the client
[Intellectual Property] Barun Law helps a victim obtain a Supreme Court Decision to quash and remand the case by demonstrating the existence of an unfair purpose against defendants who were alleged of unauthorized acquisition, use or disclosure of trade secrets
02-3479-5784
ohjun.kwon@barunlaw.com
02-3479-7549
byungjoo.kim@barunlaw.com
02-3479-4154
yongha.kim@barunlaw.com
02-3479-2381
jinsuk.kim@barunlaw.com
02-3479-7859
taehyung.kim@barunlaw.com
02-3479-2323
soonkwan.park@barunlaw.com
02-3479-7898
cw100@barunlaw.com
02-3479-7559
shlee58@barunlaw.com
02-3479-2647
younghun.jung@barunlaw.com
02-3479-4142
jinhyuk.choi@barunlaw.com
02-3479-2351
suhhee.han@barunlaw.com
02-3479-4162
taesang.kim@barunlaw.com
02-3479-5739
yeonjeong.nam@barunlaw.com
02-3479-2370
joohyun.park@barunlaw.com
02-3479-7890
minseon.shim@barunlaw.com
02-3479-7803
sejun.oh@barunlaw.com
02-3479-7599
dasol.lee@barunlaw.com
02-3479-4190
hyejun.lee@barunlaw.com
02-3479-2630
yoonji.cho@barunlaw.com
02-6956-8320
zfjin@barunlaw.com
02-3479-4198
honggi.im@barunlaw.com