법무법인바른 사이트는 IE11이상 혹은 타 브라우저에서
정상적으로 구동되도록 구현되었습니다.
익스플로러 10 이하버전에서는 브라우저 버전 업데이트 혹은
엣지, 크롬, 사파리등의 다른 브라우저로 접속을 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.
익스플로러 10 이하버전에서는 브라우저 버전 업데이트 혹은
엣지, 크롬, 사파리등의 다른 브라우저로 접속을 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.
[Tax·Civil Execution] A decision that the claim for collection (made in the name of the Republic of Korea as plaintiff by the Seoul National Tax Service) was denied in the lawsuit filed in relation to the alleged tax claim of about KRW2.24 billion, on the ground that the plaintiff did not have a claim subject to attachment against the defendant
[Corporate · Finance] A case in which we successfully overturned the district court’s decision and obtained a decision from an appeal court that the claims made by a plaintiff should be dismissed for the reason that the requirement of obtaining a prior consent from certain shareholders to key management matters of a company was ineffective because it violated the equal shareholder principle in a lawsuit filed by a holder of redeemable convertible preferred shares for the redemption payment of KRW4.3 billion and a penalty for the violation of a share purchase agreement
[Finance] Barun Law obtains the decision that the issuance of a bond with warrant is null and void in the lawsuit filed to invalidate the issuance of the bond on the ground that it infringes of the existing shareholder’s preemptive right and this decision is conclusively entered as rendered by the district court.
[Criminal] Representing a plastic surgeon who was found guilty of embezzlement of about KRW900 million from a company under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes, which he incorporated for a medical tourism project, Barun Law overturns the original decision and obtains an acquittal.
[Corporate Criminal] Achieving Dismissal of All Charges for the Reason of Insufficient Evidence for Company Executives Accused of Violating Capital Markets Act and Special Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes
[Civil] Overturning a Lower Court's Decision that Misinterpreted Corporate Shares and Assets as Partnership Property in a Partnership Agreement Where a Joint Business is Operated under the Corporation's Name and Obtaining a Decision that the Assets of the Corporation Cannot be Considered as the Assets of the Partnership Unless all the Parties are Shareholders