김상훈 변호사가 작성한 ‘민법 시행 전 호주 아닌 기혼 장남이 직계비속 없이 사망한 경우 재산상속에 관한 관습’이라는 논문이 KCI 등재지인 가족법연구 제31권 2호(통권 59호)에 게재되었습니다.
위 논문은 대법원 2015. 1. 29. 선고 2014다205683 판결을 평석한 것입니다. 이 사건의 원심은 민법 시행 전 호주 아닌 기혼 장남이 직계비속 없이 사망한 경우 기혼 장남의 아버지(호주)가 단독 상속한다고 판결한 반면, 대법원은 기혼 장남의 처가 단독 상속한다고 판결했습니다.
Attorney Sang Hoon Kim publishes “Customs of inheritance in the case an eldest son, who is married and not the head of the family prior to the enforcement of the Civil Code, dies with no direct descendents” in Korean Journal of Family Law
Attorney Sang Hoon Kim’s academic article titled, “Customs of inheritance in the case an eldest son, who is married and not the head of the family prior to the enforcement of the Civil Code, dies without any direct descendents,” in the Korean Journal of Family Law (an academic journal of the Korean Society of Family Law), Book 31, Vol. 2 (Vol. 59).
The above academic article is an annotation of the Supreme Court of Korea Decision rendered on January 29, 2015 as Judgment No. 2014Da205683. Concerning the issue of the case, that is, if an eldest son, who is married and not the head of the family prior to the enforcement of the Civil Code, dies with no direct descendents, the original court of this case ruled that the father (head of family) of the eldest son would solely inherit the property of the deceased, whereas the Supreme Court ruled that the spouse of the eldest son would solely inherit the property of the deceased.
