[HR·Labor]A decision that ex-officio dismissal of an employee is illegal if there is no proved causal relationship between the improper solicitation and the employment of the employee and causes resulting in the ex-officio dismissal is beyond the scope prescribed in the relevant rules of employment (or labor management regulations) even though it is found that a person having a close relationship with the employee has made the improper solicitation for employment

[Civil] A case in which the meaning of an “act of foreclosure” that is prohibited by a decision on the initiation of rehabilitation proceedings is clearly declared (by the Supreme Court of Korea’s remand after quashing the lower court’s decision)

[Labor] We won the lawsuits before the district and the appeal courts for employees who had been dismissed ex officio due to the allegation of employment irregularities by proving that there was no causal relationship

[Civil] Barun Law resolves a dispute through an interim injunction, an indirect compulsory application and a suit to confirm the valid existence of an agreement, which are filed against a franchisor asserting the termination of a service agreement.

[Criminal] Barun Law obtains from the Supreme Court of Korea a decision to quash and remand the lower court’s decision, which has the effect of acquittal, on the basis of the Supreme Court’s finding that the lower court illegally misunderstood the legal principles of court-oriented trials, immediacy and evidence-based trials in determining that the client was guilty of violation of the Narcotics Control Act.

[Construction] A case in which we successfully defend the client against a dispute over the sale of rental housing in a redevelopment project

[Construction & Real Estate] A case in which we are granted damages for additional corporate income tax based on an oral agreement

[Intellectual Property] We Win a Trademark Non-Use Cancellation Dispute During a Trademark Infringement Lawsuit